3 ms·
>who all do highly immoral things but nobody is telling on each other The culture of Amazon does not see this as immoral, so why would they "tell on" each othe
by tyuqfromthere 5y ago
>who all do highly immoral things but nobody is telling on each other
The culture of Amazon does not see this as immoral, so why would they "tell on" each other? And among those who maybe do see it as immoral, the managers are incentivized and compensated for it, and the non-managers are threatened with PIPs and firing if they disagree with it.
>The BR has no incentive to partake in the conspiracy, because their track record will show a high attrition rate which is against their goals
BRs do not have any kind of "track record" related to attrition rate. After a BR participates in a hiring loop, that's the end of the story for them. A BR has no incentive to not participate in this so called "conspiracy".
But furthermore, you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how the BR program works. In practice, the BR is just another interviewer that helps facilitate the debrief, and usually just defaults to echoing whatever hire decision the HM makes. If an HM wanted to hire-to-fire, the "participation" of BRs isn't required at all.
- aerosmile 5y agoHonest question - do you know all this for fact, or are you assuming this based on the collective evidence, etc? It just feels so anti-Amazon for a function specifically designed to ensure that certain things happen not to have a KPI that they are evaluated against.