3 ms·
As a person who works in cyber security, no, no we probably wouldn't share those details. It gives an edge to attackers about how we track them. Those details a
by stevemk14ebr 5y ago
As a person who works in cyber security, no, no we probably wouldn't share those details. It gives an edge to attackers about how we track them. Those details are only made public when the malicious activity is aggressive or widespread enough, at which point it's for the greater good to go public and bare it all. There is so much that goes into that blurb that you cannot even comprehend unless you work at a security agency/company, and many times on the specific incident in question.
- boomboomsubban 5y ago>There is so much that goes into that blurb that you cannot even comprehend unless you work at a security agency/company, and many times on the specific incident in question. Sure, but as a result that statement could also be full or complete bullshit and anyone not related would be unable to distinguish the difference. The times you've made that statement may have had substantial evidence behind them, but (presumably) you know just as much as me about what's being used to make this statement.