5 ms·
From: security@washingtonpost.com To: [your email] Subject: Washington Post Vulnerability Update Dear [name], Our initial investigation revealed that
by biot 15y ago
From: security@washingtonpost.com
To: [your email]
Subject: Washington Post Vulnerability Update
Dear [name],
Our initial investigation revealed that an unauthorized third party managed
to retrieve the list of user IDs and email addresses associated with
Washington Post Jobs accounts, of which yours was one. Our security team
has performed a more thorough audit of the attack which resulted in the
exposure of your information and has determined that the unauthorized third
party was also able to gain access to encrypted passwords.
Because the passwords were encrypted, it is unlikely that the attackers will
be able to access your Jobs account. However, due to the very small chance
that this unauthorized third party may be able to decrypt your password, we
are requiring every Jobs account holder to change their password within the
next 48 hours. Failure to change your password will result in your account
being permanently locked out.
To further enhance the security of our Jobs site, you will need to specify
your existing password as well as your new password. Your new password must
be at least eight characters long and have one or more upper case letters,
one or more lower case letters, and one or more numbers or symbols. Please
change your password at the following URL:
[link to phishing site that looks like Washington Post's Jobs site with a
realistic password change form that will dutifully accept your email and
current password and enforce the new password requirement for good
appearances]
Sincerely,
Washington Post Jobs Customer Service
- tptacek 15y agoAh. SQLI.
- TeMPOraL 15y agoWow. That looks legitimate. we are requiring every Jobs account holder to change their password within the next 48 hours. Failure to change your password will result in your account being permanently locked out. That's the bit that got me thinking, but more on the lines of "WTF?!" than recognizing this as a phishing attempt.
- biot 15y agoI figure most people might think if changing the password is optional, why bother? That line provides timely motivation to do so immediately. On further thought, I'd also remove the part which mentions supplying the current password and just focus on the new password requirements. The form on the site would naturally ask for their current password.