it's about security and convenience.....it's a tradeoff so it's impossible to achieve both perfectly. typically you find the balance....right now you are sugge

it's about security and convenience.....it's a tradeoff so it's impossible to achieve both perfectly. typically you find the balance....right now you are suggesting that the improvement is a convenient way of increasing security but the reality is, that security in one sense can lead to loss of it in another. example. Assuming all things are Good and no possibility for corruption then it would be purely beneficial....but since those aren't controls, and not realistic either, we cannot sacrifice security for convenience in this case.....if that makes sense.