3 ms·
"IRS offered $625,000 bounty to anyone who could 'crack' Monero; no one succeeded" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25752042 https://news.ycombinator.com/i
by Wistar 5y ago
"IRS offered $625,000 bounty to anyone who could 'crack' Monero; no one succeeded"
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25752042 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25752042
- R0b0t1 5y agoYou can analyze the dust spend in transactions to deanonymize Monero users. You need to be processing a lot of transactions to do this, or have the ability to spy on the processing of a lot of transactions.
- reedjosh 5y agoEven if someone could _see_ the transaction and identify the user behind the wallets, at least a crypto still prevents fund holding and transaction blocking.
- R0b0t1 5y agoPutting someone in jail is effectively fund holding and transaction blocking.
- reedjosh 5y agoJailing people would generate backlash far quicker than transaction blocking and fund holding. As a tool of control it can't be used as liberally, so I'd still argue crypto is a net benefit here. I'm not saying privacy isn't great, just that even without it, crypto is still useful. Privacy is absolutely an amazing force for freedom.
- R0b0t1 5y agoNot sure about that. People are generally fine with the imprisonment of people labelled as tax cheats, regardless of whether the label is accurate. The war on drugs has taken decades to reverse.