4 ms·

The threshold is very low. Well, not low enough for me. After a few attempts to answer some questions early on, I gave up. Read only for me. I don't even remem

by narag 5y ago

The threshold is very low. Well, not low enough for me. After a few attempts to answer some questions early on, I gave up. Read only for me. I don't even remember what the problem was. Why making contributing difficult and consuming easy? I guess it worked for them. Counterintuitive, but nice jackpot.

bhandziuk 5y ago
As far as I can remember it's always been this way: very low barrier to entry. All you have to do is make an account to ask and answer questions. I don't know why you had a hard time posting. Maybe you're thinking of commenting? The counter is ExpertsExchange: very difficult to do both.
- narag 5y ago
  No idea, but I was just trying to answer some questions. I remember vaguely that I needed some points to help and I needed to help to get the points, so... I shrugged and let it be.
  - wizzwizz4 5y ago
    If a question is very popular, a lot of people think it's like a normal forum and post “me too” answers. (Or, at least, they used to, before everyone knew Stack Overflow.) So there's a mechanism to “protect” questions so you need at least 10 rep (on that site – the “you contributed lots on another site so probably aren't a spammer” bonus doesn't count) before you can answer. Very few questions are protected.
- MrFantastic 5y ago
  The first post on SO for most accounts tend to be from Newbs. The people see the question and think Read The Fucking Manual and downvote. Then you have zero karma and you can't do anything else. The problem is that the Newb doesn't even know where to start in the manual.
joe463369 5y ago
As helpful as you no doubt would be, until you interact with SO in some way you're indistinguishable from a misleading moron.
- narag 5y ago
  That wasn't a problem in any of the other forums I've contributed to. Go figure!
manigandham 5y ago
Because contributing has no value unless your contribution is actually good, and often there's a lot of crap that's negative value because it's wrong or off-topic or spam. Having a barrier greatly helps overall quality.
- CRConrad 5y ago
  So downvote the contributions, then -- but you can't do that if they can't be made in the first place! Read-only site for me too. Then again, same stupid "earn points before you can post" system here on HN too.
- narag 5y ago
  Having a barrier helps manageability of the site, so from a business' perspective it's been good, indeed.
  - jfoster 5y ago
    Don't forget that a site being able to be managed & stay in business is also good for users.
    - narag 5y ago
      It wasn't good for the users whose questions I wasn't allowed to answer, but you have a point.
mkoryak 5y ago
If you want, I'll give you some points by making a bounty on some old question and giving it to you. You have to answer it though.
- narag 5y ago
  Thank you, but this was never something that I wanted to do for my own interest. I just saw someone with an unsolved problem and found out that I'd had to go through loops to help, so I gave up. Actually it seems that owners became rich and it's now a popular site without my help, so I guess it can still survive without me :)

by narag 5y ago

bhandziuk 5y ago

As far as I can remember it's always been this way: very low barrier to entry. All you have to do is make an account to ask and answer questions. I don't know why you had a hard time posting. Maybe you're thinking of commenting? The counter is ExpertsExchange: very difficult to do both.

narag 5y ago
No idea, but I was just trying to answer some questions. I remember vaguely that I needed some points to help and I needed to help to get the points, so... I shrugged and let it be.
- wizzwizz4 5y ago
  If a question is very popular, a lot of people think it's like a normal forum and post “me too” answers. (Or, at least, they used to, before everyone knew Stack Overflow.) So there's a mechanism to “protect” questions so you need at least 10 rep (on that site – the “you contributed lots on another site so probably aren't a spammer” bonus doesn't count) before you can answer. Very few questions are protected.
MrFantastic 5y ago
The first post on SO for most accounts tend to be from Newbs. The people see the question and think Read The Fucking Manual and downvote. Then you have zero karma and you can't do anything else. The problem is that the Newb doesn't even know where to start in the manual.

joe463369 5y ago

As helpful as you no doubt would be, until you interact with SO in some way you're indistinguishable from a misleading moron.

narag 5y ago
That wasn't a problem in any of the other forums I've contributed to. Go figure!

manigandham 5y ago

Because contributing has no value unless your contribution is actually good, and often there's a lot of crap that's negative value because it's wrong or off-topic or spam. Having a barrier greatly helps overall quality.

CRConrad 5y ago
So downvote the contributions, then -- but you can't do that if they can't be made in the first place! Read-only site for me too. Then again, same stupid "earn points before you can post" system here on HN too.
narag 5y ago
Having a barrier helps manageability of the site, so from a business' perspective it's been good, indeed.
- jfoster 5y ago
  Don't forget that a site being able to be managed & stay in business is also good for users.
  - narag 5y ago
    It wasn't good for the users whose questions I wasn't allowed to answer, but you have a point.

mkoryak 5y ago

If you want, I'll give you some points by making a bounty on some old question and giving it to you. You have to answer it though.

narag 5y ago
Thank you, but this was never something that I wanted to do for my own interest. I just saw someone with an unsolved problem and found out that I'd had to go through loops to help, so I gave up. Actually it seems that owners became rich and it's now a popular site without my help, so I guess it can still survive without me :)