2 ms·
"You've read 3 of your 5 free answers this month"
by chadlavi 5y ago
"You've read 3 of your 5 free answers this month"
- jbb_hn 5y agoSadly, I think you probably nailed it. Back in the day, “experts exchange” was the place to get answers to questions, and look where they’re at. 2 billion dollars. That’s a LOT of money even by 2021 standards. You better believe the investors will be looking for their ROI.
- ping_pong 5y agoExperts exchange was NEVER the place to get answers. They just perfected the SEO so that Google would point to them first. But everything was behind paywalls and it was never useful.
- jbb_hn 5y agoThat wasn’t my experience, but I’m referring to the mid to late 90’s timeframe before “paywall” was even a thing.
- quickthrower2 5y agoSO is CC at the moment IIRC - time to download it all and stick the historic stuff on a static site
- glaucon 5y agoSeems to be the case of now https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing . One of the more recent features added to SO was a timeline of activity and within the timeline you can see which license each the question is under. Here's an example for a random question https://stackoverflow.com/posts/49083680/timeline https://stackoverflow.com/posts/49083680/timeline . It's kind of weird that while the questions have a license declared the answer don't ... not sure what that's all about.
- Vinnl 5y agoThey're already periodically sending a snapshot to The Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/stackoverflow.com https://archive.org/details/stackoverflow.com
- DaiPlusPlus 5y agoThey can’t legally retroactively change the license on existing content though - and as soon as they change their EULA to say “You irrevocably assign copyright on your postings to us” then they’ll lose their thought-leader users - and the rest tumbles.
- nelsonlok 5y agoAll StackOverflow answers are Creative Commons by now. That won't be possible.
- PythonicAlpha 5y ago> "You've read 3 of your 5 free answers this month" The content was created by the contributors for free, it would be (legal) theft to do so.