11 ms·
> It didn't feel wrong but it was tedious. Every WYSIWYG HTML editor made it super easy to us...abuse tables for layouts. IIRC Dreamweaver was still rocking ta
by giantrobot 5y ago
> It didn't feel wrong but it was tedious.
Every WYSIWYG HTML editor made it super easy to us...abuse tables for layouts. IIRC Dreamweaver was still rocking table layouts until the MX 2004 release. Dreamweaver 4 and MX definitely focused on table layouts. I seem to remember MX supporting CSS but the layout focused on tables.