4 ms·

It should probably be named "Making JavaScript to startup fast on WebAssembly", since the runtime speed is not really improved by their approach. Besides that,

It should probably be named "Making JavaScript to startup fast on WebAssembly", since the runtime speed is not really improved by their approach. Besides that, I think Wizer [1] is both an elegant and a simple solution to speed up startup times with Wasm. So good work on that! [1] - https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wizer https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wizer

topspin 5y ago
"Making JavaScript to startup fast on WebAssembly" The original is at least grammatically correct.
- syrusakbary 5y ago
  I'm not a native english speaker, so some of my grammar mistakes are due to that! How would you have written it?
  - slavik81 5y ago
    Either "Making JavaScript startup fast on WebAssembly" or "Making JavaScript fast to startup on WebAssembly".
  - topspin 5y ago
    Omit "to" and it's ok. Making -> Make isn't a bad idea either, as a headline.