3 ms·
That pairing stuck out to me as well. I think the article is generally on point, but I would have rewritten the first sentence to say "it's worth mentioning tha
by chipotle_coyote 5y ago
That pairing stuck out to me as well. I think the article is generally on point, but I would have rewritten the first sentence to say "it's worth mentioning that having a metric for attrition isn't inherently bad." But having a goal for attrition is exactly the problem the article's describing.
- nebulous1 5y agoI thought they should have discussed why a company might want to incentivize managers to not be under a URA goal. They discuss why having a URA is "normal" and why it might be bad to incentivize managers to meet a certain URA, but not why a company might choose to so anyway.