3 ms·

Is there some context missing from the article? How does the quoted policy mandate the school monitor social media? If they wanted to, couldn't they have monito

Is there some context missing from the article? How does the quoted policy mandate the school monitor social media? If they wanted to, couldn't they have monitored social media before this policy was added? I'm not understanding why the author thinks this monitoring is happening, and why he thinks the policy mandates it. Edit: I've read the article like 5 times now, what am I missing that everyone else here is seeing?

1shooner 5y ago
>I'm not understanding why the author thinks this monitoring is happening, and why he thinks the policy mandates it. It all seems rather clickbait-y, but HN doesn't seem to mind.
ncallaway 5y ago
I've read both the policy and the proposed changes to the Student Conduct Code and they aren't lining up for me. I'm also left wondering what I've missed. It seems there's no language calling for active monitoring, passive monitoring or surveillance. It also seems that off-campus behaviors were previously considered to be within the scope of the Student Conduct Code and the language has been cleaned up. The new Conduct Code actually seems like it (very slightly) narrows what the University considers applicable off-campus behavior in that it introduces a new burden on the University of being able to "demonstrate a clear and distinct interest as an academic institution". I'm not really familiar with this document, so I'm hoping someone can help me understand how the proposed changes line up with the headline of the linked post
duxup 5y ago
"social media" For some reason that's in the title but I agree... I'm not seeing any mandate or etc.