3 ms·

Imho that violates the principle of least astonishment - that "at" would have such different behavior from "[]" for negative numbers.

• ZephyrBlu 5y ago
  That's the whole point of this though... Currently you can't use negative indexes, but this would make them usable.
  • Pxtl 5y ago
    Oh, I'd assumed main point was to provide a composable function.
• deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]