5 ms·
> GoCD Don't. Just don't. I'm assuming that the fundamental flaws* of GoCD haven't been fixed, based on the knowledge that in 2015 they (ThoughtWorks) still h
by Jenk 5y ago
> GoCD
Don't. Just don't.
I'm assuming that the fundamental flaws* of GoCD haven't been fixed, based on the knowledge that in 2015 they (ThoughtWorks) still hadn't addressed them, and I think 5-6 years isn't long enough for them to be addressed.
*Pipelines, as modeled in GoCD, were so inflexible that any kind of flow resulted in having many, many, pipelines configured. To the point that the number pipelines you operate and maintain is actually the multiple of any fork in logic you need.
- hughrr 5y agoThanks for the heads up. I will avoid that then!
- vergessenmir 5y agoHate to pile on GoCD. But I second this. In 2015 they were a contender when Jenkins was showing it's age and Gitlab was in its infancy. Development was fairly stagnant and felt 'closed' to external contributions. I was hopeful, but ultimately disappointed.
- hughrr 5y agoThanks. This sort of stuff is why I come here :)