> but then he actually "de-evolved" to support and empower the anti-gay evangelical bigots who STILL run the Republican party, so your argument is incoherent no

> but then he actually "de-evolved" to support and empower the anti-gay evangelical bigots who STILL run the Republican party, so your argument is incoherent nonsense that flies in the face of reality and fools nobody, in the defense of bigotry. I'd love to see something about this Are you maybe conflating transgender demands vs gay rights? There is definitely opposition to "gender is what you identify with and not something objective", which I think it's reasonable - there are biologically 2 genders (not including extra chromosome anomalies). At the same time, everyone is free to believe and say what they want and noone is trying to change that. The main opposition is around compelling speech according to someone preference not to trigger them or allowing parents to inject hormones in underage kids.