> They think it won’t be used against them, until one day it does, and they are horrified when a divorce attorney is talking about the GPS movements from their

> They think it won’t be used against them, until one day it does, and they are horrified when a divorce attorney is talking about the GPS movements from their “connected car” or their bank closes an account and locks out their funds because they attended a political protest. Not to mention those horrified at finding out that even though they deleted their tweets and videos, the feds have shown up at their doorstep because they were in a rampaging mob in the Capitol, searching for elected officials to murder. I wish there was a nice, easy answer on where to draw the line with surveillance. I'm actually glad that the insurrectionists left a zillion-mile wide electronic trail, but I'm all too acutely aware that these capabilities can be turned against anyone, and I'm dead-set against backdooring encryption. At least (US-specific here) there are nominally limits on what the government can do, but those limits are often ignored, and private corporations have much freer rein on what they can do with your data.