3 ms·
Jungle rules is not pure freedom. You need both freedom to and freedom from. The balance is struck when no ones actions impinge on another’s person or property
by throwaway316943 5y ago
Jungle rules is not pure freedom. You need both freedom to and freedom from. The balance is struck when no ones actions impinge on another’s person or property without consent. The best form of that is an agreement between the involved parties to act respectfully. The worst is abdicating all of your responsibility to big brother.
- Layke1123 5y agoIf I see you in a castle and I have nothing, I hope there's only one of me cause we coming for that loot. No where is safe on this planet for those who hoard resources to themselves.
- eloff 5y agoYou don't achieve freedom from without security. They're one and the same.
- throwaway316943 5y agoThere are different ways to provide security when it’s needed but most of what you would consider the benefits of security have more to do with everyone voluntarily obeying a set of written and unwritten rules. That’s easy to see if you ask why crime rates vary by geographic location. The same law should apply everywhere and for any given city you have the same police force so why do some areas have high crime while others have low?