4 ms·
> it just gives you some ad-hoc shortcuts Give me M-q any day over gqap (or, if you're inside a multiline comment, 3gqq; or, if you're inside a multiline comme
by gnubison 5y ago
> it just gives you some ad-hoc shortcuts
Give me M-q any day over gqap (or, if you're inside a multiline comment, 3gqq; or, if you're inside a multiline comment starting on the same line as code, just giving up).
Edit: though I have to admit that I'm missing 'dt.', 'd/something', etc.
- cosmojg 5y agoHave you tried Evil?
- karthink 5y ago'df.' is simulated with M-z (zap-to-char). There's also a zap-up-to-char command that corresponds to 'dt.', but it's not bound to anything by default. There's no doubt that it's all ad hoc though. 'd/something' is doable with C-s something RET C-w, but it's already getting tedious in comparison.
- gnubison 5y agoThanks for the tip about zap-up-to-char. > 'd/something' is doable with C-s something RET C-w Doesn't this need to be C-s something C-r RET C-w? Because C-s positions the cursor at the end of the search match.