The author really needs to bone up on clear arguments and philosophy - this topic is covered more pellucidly and at greater length elsewhere. I couldn't work ou

The author really needs to bone up on clear arguments and philosophy - this topic is covered more pellucidly and at greater length elsewhere. I couldn't work out what he was arguing for even after scrolling all the way to the end. Amazed someone could get through Phd at Camb. and not have their arsed handed to them repeatedly for poor argumentation. The reasoning throughout seems confused and wooly. Also, 'which begs the question' doesn't mean what the author think it means. Really bored of seeing this phrase misused. 'To beg the question' is a fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. What exactly is the argument? Humans are uniquely unique?