3 ms·
The second example I posted, illustrating that VSCode is 14 times slower than BBEdit, was opening a file with VSCode already open (it's not obvious, but VSCode
by robenkleene 5y ago
The second example I posted, illustrating that VSCode is 14 times slower than BBEdit, was opening a file with VSCode already open (it's not obvious, but VSCode was already open in both recordings, so this difference has nothing to do with its launch time).
There's some truth to your comment though, in that VSCode's optimizations are very on rails, i.e., if you go the slightest bit off the beaten path (like I opened a file from the Finder, instead of from the sidebar, in the BBEdit/VSCode video), then VSCode approach to optimization falls apart (you can find accounts of the tricks VSCode uses to appear fast online, there's a lot of smoke and mirrors based around specific workflows -- I think making a new tab is actually the example they use). It wouldn't surprise me if part of the reason I perceive it as so slow is I expect every feature to be fast, not just to most common ones. And I think this is a perfectly fair metric to measure by. Emacs, Vim, BBEdit, and Sublime Text are all fast at everything they do, therefore I think it's fair to call VSCode a slow editor, even if technically it's average for a couple of features.