2 ms·

>everyone's wondering why clang is so behind in C++20 support This is wrong. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support https://en.cppreference.com/w

by fooker 5y ago

>everyone's wondering why clang is so behind in C++20 support This is wrong. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support

pjmlp 5y ago
Count the number of red squares in GCC and MSVC++ versus clang.
- kergonath 5y ago
  “It has more red boxes” is not equivalent to “everyone wonders why it’s behind”, which is clearly hyperbole.
  - pjmlp 5y ago
    I advise you to spend some time on /r/cpp. Then you'll see where people are wondering. Want to use modules on clang? Wait at least another year more. No wonder that Red-Hat is hiring for clang devs, alongside the contributions they already do for GCC.
    - fooker 5y ago
      >Want to use modules on clang? Wait at least another year more. This seems wrong. Clang+LLVM has supported C++ modules for a while.
      - pjmlp 5y ago
        Not at all, it supports its own way of doing modules with header maps. Proper ISO C++20 modules are yet to be supported.