A thread from last year describing this tactic: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22798118 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22798118 Stack overflow’s TO

A thread from last year describing this tactic: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22798118 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22798118 Stack overflow’s TOS has a binding arbitration clause, [1] despite overwhelming user feedback to the contrary. [2] Y Combinator’s TOS has an arbitration clause. [3] This also applies to Hacker News. [1] https://stackoverflow.com/legal/terms-of-service/public https://stackoverflow.com/legal/terms-of-service/public [2] https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/309756 https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/309756 [3] https://www.ycombinator.com/legal/ https://www.ycombinator.com/legal/