3 ms·
it's actually just the code from here: http://jeffreybreen.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/twitter-text-mining-r-slides http://jeffreybreen.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/t
by sogrady 15y ago
it's actually just the code from here:
http://jeffreybreen.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/twitter-text-mining-r-slides http://jeffreybreen.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/twitter-text-mi...
applied against a mongodb query. obviously not statistically representative; but rather an indication of what an acceptable profile looks like.
- mechanical_fish 15y agoOf course you can measure customer sentiment. You can even measure the correlation between your brand name and a selection of happy words as they appear on Twitter. What you should probably not do, however, is elide the essential difference between these two measurements. Twitter is not a representative sample of anything but Twitter. Much of Twitter is spammers and shills, not customers. A lot of Tweets aren't even from humans. And people can mention MongoDB without knowing the slightest thing about it, and I am sure many do. I'm doing it now.
- sogrady 15y agowhere we agree then, i think, is the fact that Twitter's just another datapoint. and from a statistical perspective, it cannot be considered representative of the wider population for any number of reasons, not least the fact that it's observational rather than a random sample. that said, it's an interesting proxy for examining questions of sentiment, and its predictive ability has been examined several times academically within specific contexts (elections and markets - e.g. this one by Cornell http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.3003 http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.3003) and found to be relatively accurate. so agreed, it's not representative. but that doesn't mean it's not interesting and potentially useful.