3 ms·
beatpanda, if you haven't seen this article in Technology Review, it's a good read: http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/37718/ http://www.technologyreview
by Matt_Cutts 15y ago
beatpanda, if you haven't seen this article in Technology Review, it's a good read: http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/37718/ http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/37718/ and discusses co.cc. It's definitely the case that we saw a ton of spam on co.cc, which is one of the reasons why I posted at https://plus.google.com/u/0/109412257237874861202/posts/eanXpZKMDSf https://plus.google.com/u/0/109412257237874861202/posts/eanX... to remind people that if we see enough spam on a freehost, that can affect the reputation for the entire domain and result in us taking action on that freehost.
It remains to be seen to what degree co.cc can remove or clean the amount of spam on their domain. In the mean time, if you want to have a long-term presence on the web that's also in Google's index, you could get your own domain name or check out other freehosts such as WordPress, Tumblr, Blogger, Posterous, etc.
- beatpanda 15y agoProps to you for getting back to me. I'm not mad, and this isn't even the first time being on co.cc has bitten me in the ass, so maybe now's a good time to move on. What about 301 redirects though? Am I going to be penalized for directing traffic from the old domain to a new one?