3 ms·
The issue with your argument is the government chanced the eviction rules ex post facto. Yes, the poster is taking the risk that they tenants cannot pay, but t
by a-posteriori 5y ago
The issue with your argument is the government chanced the eviction rules ex post facto.
Yes, the poster is taking the risk that they tenants cannot pay, but they also took that risk with the assumption they could evict them and replace them with a paying tenant.
- omgwtfbbq 5y agoThen you failed to properly understand the risk associated with being a landlord. State and Federal laws can always change and can affect your landlording accordingly, your failure to account for that doesn't absolve you. I will never shed a tear for landlords and the bootlickers in this thread are really pathetic.
- rcpt 5y agoSo, if I owned stock in Denny's and the government banned indoor dining I should get my losses refunded?
- nickthemagicman 5y agoIf the government bans indoor dining, losses are the least of your worries. If the government has the power to ban dining there is no longer a free market or a free country. It's why so many people are moving to Texas. They understand the wisdom of small government.
- omgwtfbbq 5y ago>It's why so many people are moving to Texas. They understand the wisdom of small government. Lol. Yeah small government like banning abortions for millions of women or removing voting rights from more millions. "Small Government" >If the government has the power to ban dining there is no longer a free market or a free country. This is HN, not Parler. Get real.