The article begins with saying there are two ways to discuss morality: phenomenological morality, and evolutionary morality, but many (most?) comments here are

The article begins with saying there are two ways to discuss morality: phenomenological morality, and evolutionary morality, but many (most?) comments here are of the format, “morality is Darwinian” like it’s a panacea for the whole discussion. It’s really the much less important side of the discussion. Just because we evolved doesn’t mean we don’t genuinely prefer certain conscious experiences to others.