3 ms·
That's actually a rather weak argument, as it ignores the phenomenon's own intelligence. This would work if it was natural/"dumb".
by zionic 5y ago
That's actually a rather weak argument, as it ignores the phenomenon's own intelligence. This would work if it was natural/"dumb".
- SideburnsOfDoom 5y agoThe argument only fails if the phenomenon is both motivated to do this, and capable of doing it without fail for decades. i.e. it not only has to not be natural/dumb, it has to choose this pointless course of action, and execute it without failure. It's a very extra-ordinary claim that that point. With only perpetually liminal proof. We can't rule it out, but https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27354904 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27354904