3 ms·
Can you clarify something? This article reads as though energy can't be quantized. Am I misreading the article, or is that an open question now? (Or was it alwa
by boredguy8 15y ago
Can you clarify something? This article reads as though energy can't be quantized. Am I misreading the article, or is that an open question now? (Or was it always an open question, and I never understood Planck's Constant correctly?)
- WhatDoIKnow 15y agoI believe that the Holographic Universe theory states that the quantization should be larger than the Plank Constant since the Plank Constant represents the quantization at the edge of the Universe. Everything inside the universe is a projection of the information on the edge and therefore is blurrier and has a higher quantization limit.
- VladRussian 15y agothe black hole entropy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_thermodynamics#Black_hole_entropy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_thermodynamics#Black... clearly points to some factorization of physically possible 3d volume structures to closed 2d boundary of it. The reverse relation isn't even proven to be 1:1, thus it can't even remotely be called a projection. Ok, lets suppose it is 1:1 and call the reverse a "projection". Still, any narrow/specific interpretation of that factorization relationship and its reverse, like for example the Holographic Universe's projection in any geometrical/group theory quasi-straightforward sense, just doesn't have any basis for it (ie. there is no any known reason to favor any given interpretation over any other yet). Thus it is no surprise that the experimental data doesn't support and contradict that given interpretation.