3 ms·
Or, alternatively, skip the video if you're going to read the article anyway. In case you're thinking, as I did, "maybe the video will show the thing actually r
by gjm11 5y ago
Or, alternatively, skip the video if you're going to read the article anyway. In case you're thinking, as I did, "maybe the video will show the thing actually running in real time to transform video", nope: the video isn't from the people who did the research, it's from this Louis Bouchard chap and is just summarizing the paper. The video does contain some more examples than are on the webpage, though.
(It's a little surprising to me that the researchers don't seem to have produced any videos demonstrating what happens when you actually apply the process in real time. My best guess is that it turns out that slightly different images can produce substantially different outputs, so that if you apply it independently frame-by-frame to video you get flickery/shimmery/wobbly output. Personally, I'd still like to see it, even with the understanding that further work would be needed to make something that turns video into usable video.)
- jonplackett 5y agoAlternate point of view made me laugh. Also true! Would also love to see a video like that. Could be applied creatively in some way