2 ms·
I don't think people care. They don't really care about traceability/anonymity. By now basically everybody is happy to buy (almost) anything with their card. A
by atleta 5y ago
I don't think people care. They don't really care about traceability/anonymity. By now basically everybody is happy to buy (almost) anything with their card.
Also, you almost never need to do an offline transaction. (I'm not 100% sure, but IIRC that is a feature of at least some of those digital cash solutions based on blind signatures.) And if you can do prompt online transactions and you don't care much about privacy (because you trust the banks) then you don't need digital cash.
BTC and all the other blockchain bases solutions are speculative assets. They hold the promise of creating value out of nothing. So it's a strong motivation for at least some of the developers and most of the adopters. Digital cash, on the other hand, would be issued by banks, so no one could earn a profit from holding them (well, compared to holding the actual currency on their account). Though, in theory digital cash could be issued by its developers (just as blockchain based ones), but since it would sound new and obscure, people wouldn't trust it. (BTC and the blockchain took quite a few years too.)
- candiodari 5y agoBTC (actually Ethereum) are incredibly handy when doing international transactions. That these things are effectively global also makes them very useful, because of bank fees and the difficulty. At one point I actually sat down with a bank consultant to "design" a way to move money between (sets of) bank accounts in 2 countries just so we can do business. Still takes 4+ days (non-bank holidays) to actually happen. Ethereum can certainly match that and with much less costs.