> Because it is not possible to forbid procreation to ones who cannot provide enough starting capital to their children. Neither possible nor desirable, what o

> Because it is not possible to forbid procreation to ones who cannot provide enough starting capital to their children. Neither possible nor desirable, what on earth made you think I was suggesting such an absurd dystopian notion? > But one can still consider that irresponsible. No. Making children is our #1 biological imperative. In a sense, it's the only "objective" purpose we have on this land: generate descendants before we die. It's absurd to say poor people are to blame if they want to have children. > Providing to children some basic capital resources that are necessary for living in society could be done by significant share of population. Not sure what you're arguing for here.