The author starts by expressing a severely limited ontology, sets up a convenient dichotomy, and then assembles some straw men from some exclusively secular and

The author starts by expressing a severely limited ontology, sets up a convenient dichotomy, and then assembles some straw men from some exclusively secular and materialist constraints. For what is this the sugar pill? Ah, right. The homogenaity and fungibility of humanity, resistance to a single global authority is futile, give up what you have, etc. His is view is the seed of this universal morality, surely?