> That is it: it doesn't matter to the regular Joe. At all. That's what we're arguing about, isn't it? > Because it was made first priority by throwing it int

> That is it: it doesn't matter to the regular Joe. At all. That's what we're arguing about, isn't it? > Because it was made first priority by throwing it into his face as the first experience when visiting a new website by this insane regulation. I struggle to see how you go from what is the first thing you see, to what is the most important thing. > Are you really equating cookie tracking with bathroom privacy?! I am not. I am failing to understand why you think tracking is unproblematic. I'm probing to see at what point you do get concerned about invasion of privacy. > Even then, I am not sure if there are laws protecting my bathroom privacy Yeah? Try putting a camera in a bathroom that's not yours. > but if there were I am sure they don't require me so sign some sort of waiver every time I take a dump in my own damn house! Nor does a properly implemented, conformant GDPR dialog. > Well now I can sleep so much better. I was quite worried about those awful trackers and their... tracking habits. I do understand that you don't care that you're being tracked. That's fine. Carry on. I do not accept your premise that nobody cares. You are not the only person in society. If you are not in a wheelchair, I'm sure you don't personally need wheelchair ramps. Are you angry about those being mandated too? > Good thing those Brussels bureaucrats, I should have brought out my bingo board. I already have two items. What's the problem with bureaucrats? What's the problem with their location? Have you been swallowing too much UKIP rhetoric?