2 ms·
> Many Europeans see it more as "The US pay a bigger part than we do in bolstering American control of the western world", which is exactly as it should be. IMO
by throw0101a 5y ago
> Many Europeans see it more as "The US pay a bigger part than we do in bolstering American control of the western world", which is exactly as it should be. IMO the US should pay exactly 100% of the bill for its own defense and enforcement of its power projection.
You're not wrong, but NATO members have also agreed to spend 2% of their GDP on defence. Which few do.
> In 2006, NATO Defence Ministers agreed to commit a minimum of 2% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to defence spending to continue to ensure the Alliance’s military readiness.
* https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67655.htm https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67655.htm
If anyone wants to spend more than that, like the US does, that's something else.
- Dahoon 5y agoYeah but it might be because jumping ("how high?") even when not officially asked to jump might be the only safe thing to do. After all history -both recent and further back- tells us that with the US "You are either with us or against us". I don't think you can safely say no to the 2% and not be put in a box with Russia, China, etc.