3 ms·
Maybe because it's an operating system you pay for, and it's more aggressive than competitors. > MS is looking at other tech companies that do this without any
by skohan 5y ago
Maybe because it's an operating system you pay for, and it's more aggressive than competitors.
> MS is looking at other tech companies that do this without any backlash and keeps wondering why they are singled out ... Why shouldn't they try if evey other company gets away woth it?
Since when is MS late to the party on this one? They lost a huge anti-trust action for privileging their own browser decades ago. If anything MS invented this.
on a side note, it does not make sense to anthropomorphize a corporation, and a corporation does not deserve consideration on fairness grounds.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoI disagree. I do apologize since the language I used may have been a little too much of a mental shortcut, but it was not intended as such. I am not arguing fairness. I am arguing that process and laws should apply and be applied the same way for all participants. I do not think that is such a radical idea. Frankly, we would all benefit, if justice was truly blind ( long term ).
- skohan 5y agoIs anyone arguing that they shouldn't? This is an article about Microsoft's bad behavior; I'm not sure how whataboutism re competitors is relevant here.