>> (money) amassed and still hiding it? Asking for money is disgusting? Disgusting?!! They ask for money. They don't sell your data, which is what most sites/a

>> (money) amassed and still hiding it? Asking for money is disgusting? Disgusting?!! They ask for money. They don't sell your data, which is what most sites/apps you use do. They don't abuse their position, as an important information source. Disgusting compared to what? Meanwhile, Wikipedia has some of the most accessible financial information of any comparably sized organisation on the planet. This is why the get so much heat. The financials are easily understandable, which means a financially literate journalist or commentator can understand what's going on and take a cheap swipe in under a minute. You can literally understand wikimedia's finances better in 10 minutes than you could after weeks of studying any other non profit, publicly listed company, NGO or government organisation. There is no attempt to hide any controversial element... Asset accumulation, clearly and deliberately highlighted. Expense growth, ditto. Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation#Financial_summary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation#Financial...