3 ms·
I think I'm going to earn my Godwin point. My understanding is that Da'esh governance (and recruitment, to some extent) was not dissimilar to early Nazi govern
by Yoric 5y ago
I think I'm going to earn my Godwin point.
My understanding is that Da'esh governance (and recruitment, to some extent) was not dissimilar to early Nazi governance. Yes, they managed their state, but within an ideology based on an imaginary past, on permanent internal violence against real and imaginary enemies of the state, total war against foreign inferiors, and of course genocide (against Yezedi in the case of Daesh).
To add to the parallel, the economy of both states were also, to a large extent, based on plunder, and both nations were born from the ashes of scars of the partial destruction of their country at the hands of foreign powers and a revenge fantasy against said powers and the imaginary conspiracy that caused the fall.
There are also many differences, of course. But my take on it is that there are enough similarities that the world (including myself) not seeing it coming is a failure. Also, yeah, both nazis and da'esh had a mostly working state, but at what cost?
- Guthur 5y agoYes, though this also is my point. That Nazi government had a lot of individuals that were experienced in governance. I'm not talking about rallying people to cause but rather ensuring municipal activity is happening regularly and that one is generating enough revenue to sustain these activities. Arguably Nazi Germany never really had the latter though, and instead needed to borrow heavily and go to war. These points seemed that gone over the heads of most here who defaulted to the "oh look, bogeymen that we are all so superior to"