3 ms·
That sounds like a burden of proof shift. Why should that be illegal in the first place?
by qualudeheart 5y ago
That sounds like a burden of proof shift.
Why should that be illegal in the first place?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- rossjudson 5y agoBecause it's used to launder money for crime, destroy the environment, and supports the cringiest, most juvenile libertarian derp (thanks Krugman!) about freedom from the tyranny of money banking government taxes or whatever.
- qualudeheart 5y agoWell, as Rothbardian I think that would be an acceptable cost even if it were empirically true enough to matter.