4 ms·
The linked article by Nicholas Wade contains a more detailed rundown of what is currently known: https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-
by cal5k 5y ago
The linked article by Nicholas Wade contains a more detailed rundown of what is currently known:
https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/ https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-peop...
As he mentions, neither case has been proven - but he does make a fairly compelling argument that the "accidental lab leak" hypothesis best fits the available data, although there could be alternate hypotheses not considered here.
In particular, he notes that gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses was often permitted in BSL2 or 3 facilities, vs. the more stringent BSL4 used for Ebola and Smallpox research, and this makes sense - it would be a gigantic pain in the ass to do any research in a BSL4 facility, and I could see the strong impetus to perform seemingly low-risk research in a less restrictive environment.
- scarmig 5y agoOne interesting dynamic: Nicholas Wade used to be a science reporter for the New York Times, but was cancelled after publishing a book on genetics and race. I wonder if being sent into the wilderness is part of what enabled him to publicize the unpopular (at least, in the mainstream media) lab leak hypothesis.
- scotty79 5y agoOr his investment into lab leak hypothesis is just another symptom of him going into the fringe.