3 ms·
One thing that springs to mind in your example is the difference in social status. So I'm generalising (isn't all of psychology generalising..) but a person who
by jmitcheson 15y ago
One thing that springs to mind in your example is the difference in social status. So I'm generalising (isn't all of psychology generalising..) but a person who has their laundry done for them by their company seems important and valuable; a person who pays for it just seems lazy / inept.
For example, I was once told a business suit gave status because it prevented the wearer from performing physical labour. A person in a suit was displaying that they did not have to perform physical labour in order to survive, unlike others who did - thus elevating their status. Perhaps there is an element of this psychology in the domestic perks of modern day tech companies: the perks are displaying that they are important / smart enough to not have to perform some domestic duties or obtain their own sodas.
Interesting side note, that now the hoodie is becoming like the reversal of this display: it says the wearer is important / smart enough that they dont have to wear a suit
Anyway, just a random though stream. Good luck with your post!
- patio11 15y agoa person who has their laundry done for them by their company seems important and valuable I grant that California may be a funny place, but in what social pecking order do engineers at Google beat lawyers, doctors, investment bankers, hedge fund traders, CEOs, assorted executives, or any other profession that routinely hires household help, when seen from the eyes of someone who cannot do pointer arithmetic?
- rmc 15y agoa person who has their laundry done for them by their company seems important and valuable; a person who pays for it just seems lazy / inept. "Oh your company cleans your clothes? My maid cleans mine"