3 ms·
You could argue that it's good for the customer, in that the customer won't see offers that are less convenient than what is available elsewhere. In practice se
by bonzini 5y ago
You could argue that it's good for the customer, in that the customer won't see offers that are less convenient than what is available elsewhere. In practice sellers will just update prices on the other markets.
- smitty1e 5y agoPerhaps in the short term. But the capitalist notion of buyer/seller/market, with government as referee, gets wobbly when a seller buys the market. It's almost as though Amazon behaves with impunity toward the market, having already purchased the referee.