4 ms·
The classic paper on this is Standing’s 1973 “Learning 10,000 pictures.” The title really says it all: subjects shown up to 10,000 pictures (once, for a five s
by mattkrause 5y ago
The classic paper on this is Standing’s 1973 “Learning 10,000 pictures.”
The title really says it all: subjects shown up to 10,000 pictures (once, for a five seconds apiece) remembered a substantial fraction of them two days later. This is somewhat specific to images (and even moreso for “vivid” ones); people did worse with dictionary words.
However, one important detail is that subjects were told to pay careful attention to the stimuli; they were repeatedly reminded that a memory test was coming up.
PDF: https://www.sas.upenn.edu/psych/rust-lab/publications/standing_73.pdf https://www.sas.upenn.edu/psych/rust-lab/publications/standi...
Journal Page: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14640747308400340 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1464074730840034...
- Tarsul 5y agoyeah and then there was this other study where people had to count how often people would pass the ball in a video and no one noticed that there was a guy in a gorilla custom going around, because no one cared about that (they were distracted by counting). I think this is similar to how we usually try to avoid looking at ads in the internet: it's not what we are interested in at that moment! https://www.livescience.com/6727-invisible-gorilla-test-shows-notice.html https://www.livescience.com/6727-invisible-gorilla-test-show...