4 ms·
I’m using Peirce’s definition of the normative sciences[1]. As is not uncommon in English, the same words or phrases can denote different concepts and the wiki
by User23 5y ago
I’m using Peirce’s definition of the normative sciences[1]. As is not uncommon in English, the same words or phrases can denote different concepts and the wiki link you shared is a case in point.
[1] https://www.isko.org/cyclo/peirce https://www.isko.org/cyclo/peirce
- neonological 5y agoFeels arbitrary. You don't group oil painting with mechanical engineering why group Math with Beauty? This isko organization... if they do indeed follow pierce is incredibly strange. Case in point: https://www.isko.org/cyclo/peirce1.jpg https://www.isko.org/cyclo/peirce1.jpg Philosophy is under mathematics which is not under logic? Philosophy is like literature it is entirely a separate category and logic isn't even mentioned in his arbitrary grouping.