Best part of the article is the footnote, where the author characterizes his own papers: > This paper is bullshit, this paper (a NeurIPS oral) is bullshit, thi

Best part of the article is the footnote, where the author characterizes his own papers: > This paper is bullshit, this paper (a NeurIPS oral) is bullshit, this paper is complete bullshit, this paper is mostly good science but also has a sprinkling of bullshit. Apologies to my co-authors. https://jacobbuckman.com/2021-05-29-please-commit-more-blatant-academic-fraud/#fn:0 https://jacobbuckman.com/2021-05-29-please-commit-more-blata...