I'm afraid I still don't understand the workflow. I continually rebase my branch(es) on top of upstream. At any time, I can choose to consolidate a few of my W

I'm afraid I still don't understand the workflow. I continually rebase my branch(es) on top of upstream. At any time, I can choose to consolidate a few of my WIP commits into a more (logically) cohesive commit and keep that around for further rebasing. I must be missing something here, but I'm not sure what. (If it helps understanding, we work with Gerrit which basically expects a 'list of patches' on top of the branch you want to commit your changes to. So that's already part of our mentality, but we just use plain git.)