The irony... that you're reading some brutally simplified, crude, static, easily-archived HTML text whose fulltext copy has also been mailed out to thousands of

The irony... that you're reading some brutally simplified, crude, static, easily-archived HTML text whose fulltext copy has also been mailed out to thousands of readers[1] and archived in their personal mail readers and computers? A lot of bad things one could, and I have, said about Substack's technology, but "it will linkrot and can't be archived" is not one of them. [1] ACX is #2 on the Technology Substack leaderboard so it has 'thousands'; since my own newsletter is ~6k and Scott is many times more popular than I am in our circles, I'd guess the number of email copies of this ACX post is closer to 50k than 1k.