3 ms·
The first amendment (emphasis is my understanding of the part most relevant): “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiti
by jmull 5y ago
The first amendment (emphasis is my understanding of the part most relevant):
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
State governments can’t contravene the constitution either, so this applies to the state of Florida too.
- username90 5y agoSection 230 makes it clear that these companies aren't considered speakers of their user posted content, hence preventing them from moderating it doesn't impose on their free speech since the user posted content isn't considered their speech.
- jmull 5y agoSection 230 can’t modify/restrict/repeal/affect the scope and meaning of the first amendment in any way.
- pochamago 5y agoIt sounds like his argument is that moderation isn't speech, and the posts on these sites, due to 230, aren't attributable to the would be moderators, therefore the tech companies don't have a right to claim that their first amendment rights have been breached. I'm unsure what the caselaw on site moderation looks like, so i have no idea if the assertion is correct