2 ms·
I’m sitting here staring at that headline as my tablet sssslloooowwwlllyyyy debates if it’s gonna load the rest of this article and all I can think is: for who?
by egypturnash 5y ago
I’m sitting here staring at that headline as my tablet sssslloooowwwlllyyyy debates if it’s gonna load the rest of this article and all I can think is: for who?
Is this gonna be the future of work for construction? For fast food? Store clerks? Will this 20h/wk schedule pay enough to support them and their spouse and a kid or two?
I am betting the answer is “no” and that this future is only coming to Forbes’ target market, or some subset thereof.
Edit: got it to load on the other tablet, the first sentence says this is only talking about white-collar workers, so... nope!
- ben_w 5y agoPerhaps, but… I suspect that rent[0] is related to how much “spare” money people have, and that land prices (and the land component of house and apartment prices) are related to rent potential, so a substantial reduction of working hours may merely reduce those costs. [0] Strongly WRT rent of real estate, weakly WRT all economic rent: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_rent https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_rent