> Just found this overview by NIH on why they don't recommend treatment. What do they recommend? Wait until you're sick enough to go to hospital. This a year i

> Just found this overview by NIH on why they don't recommend treatment. What do they recommend? Wait until you're sick enough to go to hospital. This a year in a half into the pandemic, and you don't see the problem? Compare this to the treatment protocol of the FLCCC https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/ https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-pl... > Maybe, but they're not censoring anything in my books. I'd estimate about 90% of social media posts about Ivermectin get censored on social media. https://www.wsj.com/articles/youtube-cancels-the-u-s-senate-11612288061 https://www.wsj.com/articles/youtube-cancels-the-u-s-senate-... https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/feb/16/craig-kelly-banned-from-facebook-for-a-week-for-posting-covid-misinformation https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/feb/16/craig... They literally have policies saying if you're posting anything about Ivermectin, it's misinformation, and it will get removed. How is that not censorship? https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785 https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785 Just now the Ivermectin Global Summit has been removed from YouTube. A medical conference gets removed and you claim that there's no censorship? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGefHqcnmio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGefHqcnmio You probably won't believe the censorship until you'll experience it first hand.