3 ms·
Just to be clear my question was rhetorical. You have to do an autopsy to have a reasonable guess about the cause. A 90 year old has a 13% chance of dying for a
by trompetenaccoun 5y ago
Just to be clear my question was rhetorical. You have to do an autopsy to have a reasonable guess about the cause. A 90 year old has a 13% chance of dying for any reason within a year (in the US, see here: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html). If it's not the virus it may be their liver, or their heart, or, and this is interesting now, chronic respiratory diseases. This has been a leading cause of death for a long time (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm).
>are there any other significant factors contribute to those people's death in that period?
Multiple things can contribute. Our body is an extremely complex organism. Putting a death down to 100% this or that when in reality it's a lot more complicated isn't just imprecise, it's often flat out wrong.
And just because events coincide doesn't mean there's causality. If 1000 people died on a day with severe thunderstorms around the country that doesn't mean the thunderstorms killed them all. When old people with a virus infection die it's reasonable to assume there could be a connection, but you can't just say everyone who tested positive in a given time died of the virus.
- temp8964 5y agoFor 90 year olds, the COVID caused death probably happens in a few weeks, instead of within a year, right? I agree "events coincide doesn't mean there's causality", but I think the causation here is still pretty strong, even for 90 year olds.