2 ms·
If the article isn't implying Apple is ahead in AR wearables I guess I don't understand why AR wearables are brought up at all.
by jayd16 5y ago
If the article isn't implying Apple is ahead in AR wearables I guess I don't understand why AR wearables are brought up at all.
- ska 5y agoI suppose for why you would have to take that context from the article; the argument that was in the "out there" parts of AR (e.g. glasses/goggles) nobody has shipped anything with real impact, but in the less flashy areas (e.g. assistive touch) Apple is years ahead. Plus a bit about M&A shifting apples capability in these areas. All sounds plausible. What this translates to in some potential future where more ambitious AR projects find a fit with consumers, who knows. But it terms of systems that ship today, article seems pretty accurate, and not at all deserving of your "what a joke".